sirthias / borer

Idiomatic CBOR (de)serialization in Scala



A CBOR and JSON (de)serialization implementation in Scala sporting these features:

  • complete (supports all CBOR features, incl. "over long" integers, 16-bit half-precision floats, BigInteger and BigDecimal, custom tags and "simple values")
  • lightweight (zero external dependencies)
  • fast (no DOM, pull-parser style with one-element look-ahead)
  • easy integration and customization (type class-based design)
  • efficiently supports custom "byte string" abstractions (like akka.util.ByteString or scodec.bits.ByteVector)
  • scala.js support

Apart from CBOR BORER also supports high-performance de- and encoding from and to JSON through the same API. One example where this is useful is providing "bilingual" REST APIs that can consume and produce both CBOR and JSON. BORER makes this very easy.

Maven Central Uses Badges

Basic Design Principles and Limitations

BORER's goal is to provide a highly efficient (de)serialization layer between some data model defined in Scala and CBOR and/or JSON as storage/network formats. BORER performs this task in the most direct way, without relying on some Abstract Syntax Tree (AST, also called Document Object Model (DOM)) as intermediate structure.

As such it doesn't offer any facilities for pre- or post-processing the serialized data, like manipulating the JSON structure, filtering or augmenting nodes, or the like.

Also, it doesn't rely on reflection in any way. All information about the types to encode and decode must be statically available at the encoding/decoding point. With the exception of sealed ADT hierarchies (which are supported out of the box) this means that you need to define yourself, how to represent type information of abstract types on the wire!

Another design principle has been to implement BORER's core module without relying on Scala macros or depending on any external libraries. This should make BORER easily maintainable for the foreseeable future and reduces its weight as a dependency of your applications (which can be especially important with scala.js). (Note: The borer-derivation module does rely on macros for deriving encoder/decoder type classes, but its use is completely optional.)


BORER consists of these modules:

  • borer-core, no dependencies
  • borer-derivation, (semi-)automatic codec derivation for case classes and ADTs, depends on Magnolia
  • borer-compat-akka, support for akka.util.ByteString, depends on akka-actor
  • borer-compat-scodec, support for scodec.bits.ByteVector, depends on scodec

Additionally, as a dependency of borer-derivation, BORER also contains a borer-magnolia module, which contains an internalized, patched copy of Magnolia.


The artifacts for BORER live on Maven Central and can be tied into your SBT-based Scala project like this:

libraryDependencies += "io.bullet" %% "borer-core" % "<version>"
libraryDependencies += "io.bullet" %% "borer-derivation" % "<version>" // for (semi-)automatic codec derivation
libraryDependencies += "io.bullet" %% "borer-compat-akka" % "<version>" // for direct `akka.util.ByteString` support
libraryDependencies += "io.bullet" %% "borer-compat-scodec" % "<version>" // for direct `scodec.bits.ByteVector` support

BORER is available for Scala 2.12, 2.13.0-RC1 as well as scala.js (0.6 for Scala 2.12 and 1.0.0-M7 for Scala 2.13).

Basic Usage

Encoding a value to a plain Array[Byte]:

import io.bullet.borer.Cbor

val value = List("foo", "bar", "baz") // example value

val bytes: Array[Byte] =
  Cbor.encode(value).toByteArray // throws on error

Decoding a plain Array[Byte] back to a certain type:

import io.bullet.borer.Cbor

val list: List[String] =
  Cbor.decode(bytes).to[List[String]].value // throws on error

If you don't want BORER to throw exceptions you can use the following variants to give you a Try instead:

val encoded: Try[Array[Byte]] =


val decoded: Try[List[String]] =

Or, if you prefer encoding/decoding to an Either instance:

import io.bullet.borer.{Cbor, Output}

val encoded: Either[Cbor.Error[Output], Output] =


import io.bullet.borer.{Cbor, Input}

val decoded: Either[Cbor.Error[Input], (List[String], Input)] =

Check the sources of the central BORER API entry point here for more info.

Types Supported Out-of-the-Box

BORER comes with built-in encoding and decoding support for arbitrary combinations of these types:

  • Boolean, Char, Byte, Short Int, Long, Float, Double and their boxed counterparts
  • Null
  • String
  • Array[Byte]
  • java.math.BigInteger, java.math.BigDecimal and their scala wrappers BigInt and BigDecimal
  • Option[T]
  • Array[T]
  • M[T] <: Iterable[T]
  • M[A, B] <: Map[A, B]
  • Iterator[T] (encoding only!)
  • Either[A, B]
  • Tuple1[A] ... Tuple22[A, B, ... V]

All these type are encoded to exactly one CBOR (or JSON) data item (which may of course be an array or map consisting of other, nested data items.)

Encoding and Decoding Custom Types

In order to encode some custom type T you'll have to implicitly provide an Encoder[T], which is defined like this:

trait Encoder[T] {
  def write(w: Writer, value: T): w.type

Similarly, for decoding of T you'll have to implicitly provide Decoder[T], which is defined like this:

trait Decoder[T] {
  def read(r: Reader): T

Many times, when encoding and decoding must be available for a type it's easier to supply just a single implicit for T, rather than two. As an alternative to providing a separate Encoder[T] as well as a Decoder[T] you can also provide a Codec[T], which is defined like this:

final case class Codec[T](encoder: Encoder[T], decoder: Decoder[T])

Encoders and Decoders can be implicitly "unpacked" from a Codec.

NOTE: In order to not hinder composability Codecs should only ever be supplied, never consumed. So, if you write an Encoder, Decoder or Codec for a generic type, which itself requires implicitly available encoders and/or decoders for certain type parameters (like Encoder.forOption, for example) then you should never require an implicitly available Codec[T], but rather an Encoder[T] and Decoder[T] separately.

There are several ways to provide such encoders, decoders or codecs for your custom types.
The following sections outline the alternatives.

Case Classes

If T is a case class then an Encoder[T] and/or Decoder[T] can be concisely provided by via the unapply / apply methods of the T companion object:

import io.bullet.borer.{Encoder, Decoder, Codec}

case class Color(name: String, value: Int)

implicit val encoder = Encoder.from(Color.unapply _)
implicit val decoder = Decoder.from(Color.apply _)

// alternative: provide an Encoder and Decoder at the same time
implicit val codec = Codec[T](Color.unapply _, Color.apply _)

// alternative: sugar for the above 
implicit val enc = Encoder.forCaseClass[Color] 
implicit val dec = Decoder.forCaseClass[Color]

// or simply
implicit val codec = Codec.forCaseClass[Color]

The codecs created in this way always encode a case class instance to a single CBOR/JSON data item: an array with the length corresponding to the case classes arity and the member encodings forming the array elements.
There is one exception though: In order to increase encoding efficiency unary case classes, with only one parameter, have their single member written directly, without a wrapping single-element array.

If you would like your case classes to be encoded in a more JSON-esque way, as maps with each member being keyed by its member name, check out the borer-derivation module described below.

Transforming Existing Encoders / Decoders

If your type is not a case class but can somehow be constructed from or deconstructed to any available Encoder or Decoder respectively, you can rely on the contramap and map methods available on Encoders / Decoders:

import io.bullet.borer.{Encoder, Decoder}

class Person(name: String)

// have `Person` be encoded as a simple CBOR text data item 
implicit val encoder = Encoder.forString.contramap[Person](
implicit val decoder =

"Manual" Construction

For full flexibility of how your type T is to be encoded in CBOR you can of course also write the respective Encoder[T] / Decoder[T] manually. This is done by explicitly defining how your type is to be written to a Writer and read from a Reader:

import io.bullet.borer.{Encoder, Decoder}

class Person(name: String)

implicit val encoder: Encoder[Person] = Encoder((writer, person) => writer.writeString(
implicit val decoder: Decoder[Person] = Decoder(reader => Person(reader.readString()))

On the encoding side the Writer gives you a number of different methods for writing CBOR primitives, while the Reader offers their counterparts on the decoding side. The next section has some more details on how to work with these two types.

While this low-level way of defining the encoding/decoding logic is the most powerful it also requires a little more care.
For performance reasons both the Writer and Reader types are mutable abstractions, which means that the order in which you call their methods matters a lot.

Also, very importantly, when deciding on an encoding logic for any type (i.e. how to represent the type with the available CBOR primitives) make sure to always encode it to exactly one CBOR data item! (Unless you know exactly, what you are doing.) All built-in encoders and decoders, e.g. for case classes, arrays, maps, etc., always assume that any object is written to exactly data item.
So, if you need to write several values, wrap them in an array or map! And rather than writing no value at all write some kind of placeholder, like null, undefined or an empty array or map!

To illustrate the point: The default codec for Option[T] for example encodes Some[T] to a single element array holding the encoding of T, and None to a zero-element (empty) array!

While BORER (by default) verifies that the CBOR/JSON created by your application is indeed valid and will thus catch any mistakes you made in this regard eventually, debugging structural problems can be a bit tedious since the error will often only be recognizable at the very end of the encoding or decoding process. Check out the section on Logging below for more info how BORER can support you in debugging (de)serialization issues.

Reader and Writer

All pre-defined Encoders and Decoders, as well as the ones you might write yourself, describe how to encode or decode and object by operating on a Writer or Reader, respectively.

The Writer (sources here) contains a largish number of methods (like writeInt, writeString or writeArrayHeader) that more or less directly write the respective data item to the output. The Reader (sources here) contains the respective counterparts (like readInt, readString or readArrayHeader).

The Writer and Reader operate directly on the respective Output and Input data "streams" and simply cause the respective low-level "primitive" to be written or read. This means, that the logic working with them has to have at least a basic understanding of the rules governing how these primitives can be or must be combined in order to produce valid output.

For example, an "indefinite-length array" (in CBOR terminology) is written by first calling writer.writeArrayStart(), then writing all the elements (recursively descending into any nested structures) and finally "closing" the array with writer.writeBreak().\

On the reading side this is mirrored by first having to call reader.readArrayStart(), then reading all the elements (recursively decoding nested structures) and finally consuming the "closing" with reader.readBreak().

While BORER implements validation logic (enabled by default), which verifies the structural integrity of all produced and consumed data, there are no static (type-level, i.e. compile-time) checks that catch you, when you forget to write or read the BREAK primitive at the end!

When consuming CBOR data during decoding the READER gives you one-element look-ahead. This means that you can "see" the kind of the next data item (primitive) that is available before reading it, which is often very helpful.

For example, here is an potential Decoder[Either[String, Int]]:

import io.bullet.borer.Decoder

implicit val eitherStringIntDecoder: Decoder[Either[String, Int]] =
  Decoder { reader =>
    if (reader.hasString) Left(reader.readString())
    else if (reader.hasInt) Right(reader.readInt())
    else reader.unexpectedDataItem(expected = "`String` or `Int`")   

Input, Output, ByteAccess

In order to allow for seamless integration in all kinds of application environments BORER abstracts over decoding input, encoding output as well as general "chunks of bytes" with three additional type classes Input[T], Output[T] and ByteAccess[T].


For decoding BORER will happily consume any type for which an Input.Wrapper[T] is implicitly available, which is responsible for constructing an Input around T.

Currently BORER comes with predefined Input implementations for these types:

  • Array[Byte]
  • java.nio.ByteBuffer
  • akka.util.ByteString (with the borer-compat-akka module)
  • scodec.bits.ByteVector (with the borer-compat-scodec module)

The Input trait isn't particularly hard to implement, especially since it merely has to support single-pass access to the underlying bytes with minimal buffering, no random access.


On the encoding side BORER can produce any type T for which an Output.Provider[T] is available, which is responsible for producing an Output instance whose final output result has type T.

Currently BORER comes with predefined Output implementations for these types:

  • Array[Byte]
  • java.nio.ByteBuffer
  • akka.util.ByteString (with the borer-compat-akka module)
  • scodec.bits.ByteVector (with the borer-compat-scodec module)

The Output trait isn't hard to implement as it simply writes out all bytes in a single, monotonic pass.


Unfortunately Scala (and the whole JVM eco-system) has no single, versatile abstraction for a "chunk of bytes" that fits the needs of all applications. In order to remain open to the preferences of the application BORER also abstracts over "chunks of bytes" by allowing the use of any type T, for which a ByteAccess[T] is available.

Currently BORER comes with predefined ByteAccess implementations for these types:

  • Array[Byte]
  • java.nio.ByteBuffer
  • akka.util.ByteString (with the borer-compat-akka module)
  • scodec.bits.ByteVector (with the borer-compat-scodec module)

JSON Support

Since the CBOR data item primitives are a super set of what is available in JSON, or, said differently, everything in JSON has a counterpart in CBOR, it's not hard for BORER to also support encoding to and decoding from JSON.

Here is how to encode a value to a plain Array[Byte] holding the UTF-8-encoded JSON output:

import io.bullet.borer.Json

val value = List("foo", "bar", "baz") // example value

val bytes: Array[Byte] = Json.encode(value).toByteArray // throws on error

Decoding a plain Array[Byte] holding UTF-8-encoded JSON input back to a certain type:

import io.bullet.borer.Json

val list: List[String] = Json.decode(bytes).to[List[String]].value // throws on error

The io.bullet.borer.Json object supports the same API as the io.bullet.borer.Cbor object.

From BORER's point of view JSON is simply a slightly different binary format that only supports a subset of the models data primitives. Like with CBOR BORER encodes and decodes JSON in a single pass, UTF-8 encoding and decoding to and from raw bytes on the fly.

All higher-level infrastructure (i.e. Writer, Reader, Encoder, Decoder, Codec, etc.) is essentially agnostic to the (de)serialization target format. However, the Writer and Reader types do have a target member, which enables custom logic to discriminate between the two variants, if required.
Since the underlying JSON renderer will throw exceptions on attempts to write data primitives that are not supported in JSON (like CBOR Tags), this is sometimes necessary to efficiently support both formats.

For example, in order to write an empty array in the most efficient way to both CBOR and JSON one would use this approach:

import io.bullet.borer.Writer

def writeEmptyArray(w: Writer): w.type =
  if (writingJson) writeArrayStart().writeBreak()
  else writeArrayHeader(0) // fixed-sized Array Headers are not supported in JSON

However, as long as you don't use the Reader and Writer APIs to directly write low-level data primitives (like Arrays and Maps), but simply construct your (de)serialization logic from the BORER's built-in Encoders and Decoders, your application should be able to support both CBOR and JSON at the same time without any special casing.

JSON Performance

BORER comes with a fast JSON parser optimized for modern superscalar 64-bit CPUs, which enables BORER to significantly outperform many other popular JSON libraries in the scala eco-system, when it comes to transforming JSON into a case-class based data model from raw bytes.

A benchmark against 18 real-world JSON data examples from a diverse set of sources shows that BORER 0.9.0's JSON parsing infrastructure outperforms Circe by a factor of 1.3 - 2.9 (average: 1.71), the venerable spray-json by a factor of 2.0 - 5.6 (average: 3.4) and even Jackson Scala by about 10 percent on average.
(JMH -wi 10 -i10 -t4 -f4 on OpenJDK 12.0.1, parsing from raw bytes into the same data model.
Results on GraalVM are pending...)

This is despite BORER's external API being geared more towards user-friendliness than pure performance. From a pure performance perspective a full type class-based design isn't ideal, since type classes can cause a lot of call sites to become "megamorphic". Also, BORER's pull-style parser provides the user with one-element look-ahead, which enables parsing into a DOM (if required), but, unfortunately, makes certain other performance optimizations unavailable.

Comparison with other Scala JSON Libraries

  • Circe

    • DOM- and type class-based design
    • PROS
      • very mature
      • allows for extensive DOM-manipulation
      • many integration option already available
      • compatible with scala.js
    • CONS
      • depends on cats-core
      • type class derivation can be slow (at compile time)
      • BORER parses JSON from raw bytes about 1.7 times as fast
      • no CBOR support
  • spray-json

    • DOM- and type class-based design
    • PROS
      • zero dependencies
    • CONS
      • pre-historic, clunky type class design
      • essentially unmaintained
      • no support for case classes w/ more than 22 members
      • no type class derivation for ADTs
      • BORER parses JSON from raw bytes about 3.4 times as fast
      • not compatible with scala.js
      • no CBOR support
  • µPickle

    • pull-style, type class-based design
    • PROS
    • CONS
      • no support for case classes w/ more than 22 members
      • BORER parses JSON from raw bytes about twice as fast (on average)
      • no CBOR support
  • Jackson Scala

    • Java implementation with a Scala add-on
    • PROS
      • very mature
      • good performance, especially when writing JSON
    • CONS
      • no type class-based API
      • several non-Scala dependencies
      • not compatible with scala.js
  • Jsoniter Scala

    • pull-style, type class-based design
    • PROS
      • zero dependencies
      • very high performance (about twice as fast as BORER)
      • highly configurable
    • CONS
      • zero look-ahead API, DOM construction impossible
      • not compatible with scala.js
      • no CBOR support

When (not) to use BORER for JSON

Since BORER treats JSON as a binary format and reads/writes from/to raw bytes it isn't optimized for consuming or producing Strings. (Strings have to first be UTF-8 encoded in order to be readable by BORER.) So, if you need to frequently consume String input other JSON libraries will likely perform better. Also, if you need to manipulate the JSON structures in any way between (de)serializing from/to the wire and from/to your data model then BORER will not help you and a DOM/AST-based JSON solution (like Circe) will likely be the better choice.

However, if all you need is an efficient way to convert raw network- or disk-bytes holding UTF-8 encoded JSON to and from your data model types, with no (or few) dependencies and maybe even with the option to target CBOR with no additional work required from your side, then BORER should be a good choice.

Document Object Model (DOM)

While BORER's core design is DOM-less, writing directly to and reading directly from the respective stream of CBOR/JSON data items, it is sometimes convenient to nevertheless have access to an object structure that mirrors the structure of a CBOR message as closely as possible. (Many JSON-libraries for example solely rely on such an "AST" structure for their encoding and decoding operations.)

For such cases BORER provides you with a simple "DOM" ADT (see the respective source file here), which you can use like this:

import io.bullet.borer.Cbor
import io.bullet.borer.Dom._

val dom = MapElem.Sized(
  "foo" -> ArrayElem.Sized(IntElem(42), StringElem("rocks")),
  "bar" -> DoubleElem(26.8)

val encoded = Cbor.encode(dom).toByteArray
val decoded = Cbor.decode(encoded).to[Element].value


With CBOR being a binary format debugging problems can sometimes be a bit more difficult than with text-based formats like JSON, which are immediately human-readable.

In order to help debug problems with encoding or decoding, independently of whether they are caused by your own application code or invalid / unexpected input, you can easily switch on logging of the encoding or decoding process with the .withPrintLogging() modifier.

For example, this snippet:

import io.bullet.borer.Cbor

val value =
    "foo"  Left(42),
    "bar"  Right(List("For", "the", "King!"))
val encoded = Cbor.encode(value).toByteArray

val decoded = 
    .withPrintLogging() // just insert this line to enable logging
    .to[Map[String, Either[Int, List[String]]]]

produces this logging output to the console:

1: {
    1/2: "foo"
    1/2: -> {
        1/1: 0
        1/1: -> 42
    1/2: }
    2/2: "bar"
    2/2: -> {
        1/1: 1
        1/1: -> [
            1/3: "For"
            2/3: "the"
            3/3: "King!"
        1/1: ]
    2/2: }
1: }
2: END

which makes it very easy to see, what exactly the decoding input consists of. Also, in case of any exception the log will break off exactly at the point where the exception got thrown, which is often a great help in locating the problem.


The borer-core module by itself only provides relatively limited support for case classes and no support for sealed Abstract Data Types (ADT) hierarchies.

When you include the borer-derivation module as a dependency (see Installation above) BORER can (semi-automatically) provide encoders and decoders for case classes and ADTs by deriving them with the help of Magnolia.

There are two basic alternatives to choose from: Array-Based Codecs or Map-Based Codecs.

Array-Based Codecs

Array-Based Codec derivation is enabled with this import:

import io.bullet.borer.derivation.ArrayBasedCodecs._

This brings the three methods deriveEncoder[T], deriveDecoder[T] and deriveCodec[T] in scope, which you can use to derive the respective type classes for case classes and ADTs.

Here is an example:

import io.bullet.borer.derivation.key
import io.bullet.borer.derivation.ArrayBasedCodecs._

sealed trait Animal
case class Dog(age: Int, name: String)                                        extends Animal
@key("TheCAT") case class Cat(weight: Double, color: String, home: String) extends Animal
@key(42) case class Mouse(tail: Boolean)                                   extends Animal

implicit val dogCodec = deriveCodec[Dog]
implicit val catCodec = deriveCodec[Cat]
implicit val mouseCodec = deriveCodec[Mouse]

implicit val animalCodec = deriveCodec[Animal]

With these codecs case classes are written to CBOR/JSON in exactly the same fashion as with the case class support in borer-core module (see above), i.e. to simple arrays (or the unwrapped member encoding if the case classes has arity 1).

An Abstract Data Type (ADT) is encoded as a CBOR array of length two, with the first element holding the type id and the second holding the instance's encoding (i.e. an array or single element).

The type id is required to allow the decoder to determine which ADT sub-type to decode into. By default BORER will use type's short class name as a (textual) type id. If you want to customize this you can use the @key annotation to do so. Check out the @key sources [here][key Source] for more info.

Map-Based Codecs

Map-based codec derivation is enabled with this import:

import io.bullet.borer.derivation.MapBasedCodecs._

With these codecs case classes are encoded as CBOR/JSON maps with the member name as key, much as you would normally expect a JSON codec to do it.

ADTs are encoded as single-entry maps, with the key being the type id (@key or simple class name) and the value becoming the encoding of the actual ADT subtype instance.

Default Values

Map-based codecs support missing and extra members. Extra members (i.e. map keys present in the encoding but not defined as a case class member or @key) are simply being ignored.
For missing members the type's Decoder will use the potentially defined default value, e.g.:

import io.bullet.borer.Json
import io.bullet.borer.derivation.MapBasedCodecs._

case class Dog(age: Int, name: String = "<unknown>")

implicit val dogCodec = deriveCodec[Dog]

  .decode("""{ "age": 4 }""")
  .value ==> Dog(age = 4) 

Also, Encoder/Decoder type classes can implement the Encoder.DefaultValueAware / Decoder.DefaultValueAware trait in order to alter their behavior in the presence of a default value.

This is used, for example, by the pre-defined encoder and decoder for Option[T], which change their encoding/decoding strategy, if a None default value is defined for a case class member. In this case the optional value will only be written if it's defined (and then without any wrapping structure). If the option is undefined nothing is written at all. Correspondingly, during decoding the presence of the member yields a defined option instance holding the decoded value while the member's missing in the encoding yields None.

This behavior matches the intution of what an Option[T] case class member would behave like when written to a JSON representation.

Customized Member Keys

BORER supports customizing the name of case class members in the encoding with the @key annotation, that is also used for custom ADT type-ids (see above). Simply annotate a case class member do provide a custom name:

import io.bullet.borer.Json
import io.bullet.borer.derivation.key

case class Dog(age: Int, @key("the-name")name: String)

implicit val dogCodec = deriveCodec[Dog]

Json.encode(Dog(1, "Lolle")).toUtf8String ==>

Derivation Gotchas

Since BORER derivation relies on Magnolia for doing the dirty macro work behind the scenes there are a few gotchas to be aware off.

First, BORER derivation is intentionally not fully automatic, i.e. codecs are not created implicitly but require you to write one line per type. The best-practice here is to cache the created codec in an implicit val or implicit lazy val (in case there are circular dependencies between the types).

Without this explicit caching (i.e. when Magnolia provides the codecs implicitly, on demand) the code created for recursive ADT hierarchies can quickly become enormous and make compilation as well as runtime unusually slow or even fail. (See Magnolia issues 79 and 114 for more info.)

When you cache the individual codecs in their own respective vals (or lazy vals) Magnolia's derivation is fast and efficient.

Nullable and Default

One question that frequently arises when dealing with JSON, and to a limited extend CBOR as well, is how to deal with null values.

null values differ from missing members (see also Map-Based Codecs above) in that the value for an element is indeed present, but is null.

BORER handles this case in a properly typed fashion: If your data model allows for certain members to have a null encoding the member's type should be wrapped with Nullable, e.g. Nullable[String]. In combination with the simple type class Default[T], which provides the capability to supply default values for a type T, the pre-defined encoder and decoder for Nullable[T] will be able to translate null values to the respective default value and back.


import io.bullet.borer._

case class Dog(age: Int, name: Nullable[String])

implicit val dogCodec = deriveCodec[Dog]

  .decode("""{ "age": 4, "name": null }""")
  .value ==> Dog(age = 4, name = "") // the `Default[String]` provides an empty String 

Akka Support

The borer-core module by itself only knows how to encode to and decode from plain byte arrays (Array[Byte]). When you include the borer-compat-akka module as a dependency (see Installation above) and

import io.bullet.borer.compat.akka._

you also get full "zero-copy" support for encoding to and decoding from akka.util.ByteString as well as an implicit Encoder[ByteString] and Decoder[ByteString].

Scodec Support

The borer-core module by itself only knows how to encode to and decode from plain byte arrays (Array[Byte]). When you include the borer-compat-scodec module as a dependency (see Installation above) and

import io.bullet.borer.compat.scodec._

you also get full "zero-copy" support for encoding to and decoding from scodec.bits.ByteVector as well as an implicit Encoder[ByteVector] and Decoder[ByteVector].


BORER is released under the MPL 2.0.

Contributions are always welcome!